What must happen if a judge of the Supreme Court is personally involved in a case?

When a judge of the Supreme Court is personally involved in a case, it is crucial to maintain the integrity and impartiality of the judicial process. This often means that the judge must recuse themselves from participating in that particular case to avoid any conflict of interest or perception of bias. Inviting a district judge to sit in place of the Supreme Court judge is a common practice to ensure that the case continues to be heard by a qualified judicial officer. This process helps in upholding the legal principles of fairness and justice, allowing for an unbiased resolution of the case by a judge who has no personal stake in the outcome.

This approach preserves the continuity of court proceedings while maintaining the ethical standards expected of judicial figures. Other options, such as dismissing the case, replacing the suspended judge with another justice, or simply rescheduling the trial, do not effectively address the need for impartiality in the judicial process.